There are a few things that come into play here, here they are before I show off my solution. And, if the internet is completely down in some kind of natural disaster, you will still have a second secure copy of your clips (Making it far superior to cloud NVR solutions!) Prerequisites ![]() ![]() Because of this setup, even if you have slow internet, this should work. From there, the clips are stored locally and uploaded to cloud storage. Next, I have an FTP server on my local network, but in a different (also secure) physical location where the clips are synced. This means that the clips will 100% have a chance to leave their location before someone could get to the NVR The general idea with my setup is that my home is secure, and my NVR is in a location my in home which is also secure. There doesn't seem to be a very good way of getting Cloud Sync to see external volumes or file shares, you could get it to work, but it never synced as well as having the files directly on the device I personally like having the clips directly on the box so that my cameras are recording all the time, even when I am doing maintenance and updates on my other network devices. The downsides to this are that you need to purchase a very expensive Synology NAS, and that you now need to store your clips off of the Blue Iris box. This worked VERY well and seemed to just be able to partially update the file on the other end when the clip finished recording. The way I found this to actually work is to have the clips on a Synology NAS and use Synology Cloud Sync. brv file while its being written to, because Blue Iris doesn't lock the file (Which results in you being able to play a currently recording clip) none of the sync applications seem to figure out when to start syncing The other way to do this is to have your clips stored on a file server on a Linux box and use rclone to sync the clips off-site, I tried this and had the same issues as above, it just can't tolorate syncing a. Some of them were also paid applications, which I just couldn't justify for how well they worked in this application I tried SyncBackPro, Syncovery, robocopy and a few others, all of them were a pain to setup, and just not very nice solutions to the problems. Every week I'd do a comparison on the number of files synced, and the total size, and they were always different. bvr files, it would often end up with incomplete clips being synced off-site, resulting in a mismatch between what was on-site and what was off-site. In theory this should work great, but I found that due to how Blue Iris uses the. You could just use an application outside of Blue Iris to sync the clips off-site, you can point the syncing application to the folder that Blue Iris uses for clip storage, and have it sync either on a schedule or just as changes are made. If you want to get clips off-site in FTP, you almost certainly need to spin up some kind of virtual server in the cloud, which is expensive Using non-native file syncing If they do, they are usually very expensive. The other issue is that almost no cloud storage providers support FTP. The main issue here is clearly that all of your data is transferred across the internet completely un-encrypted, since we are transferring video footage of your house, and potentially inside your house, you should be able to see why this is a problem. ![]() With Blue Iris, you are stuck using un-encrypted FTP ![]() I want ALL of the clips! Why FTP SucksĬurrently almost every other camera system supports some kind of "instant" off-site storage, usually at a cost, but at least its possible and at the very least its secured with SSL in transit. Many people try and combat this by having motion emails with screenshots included, however I feel like this is a pretty poor solution as then you only get a few snapshots of what is going on. Its pretty simple, what if someone kicks down your door and steals all your stuff, along with your NVR? Then you will not have the footage of them arriving and breaking in which could be used to help identify and catch them If you just want the guide, skip to the end! Why do you need clips off-site? This would let you use a huge selection of cloud object storage platforms to get your clips off-site in a fast, secure and cheap way. At the very least SFTP would be great, but even better would be S3 compatibility. I have been using Blue Iris for my NVR for over 6 years, and despite FTP being a legacy protocol the entire time, Blue Iris has not listened to the overwhelming cry for a modern, secure and native way to get clips off-site. Blue Iris is a great NVR solution, but its extremely lacking as FTP is its only native off-site clip exporting protocol.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |